WebIn Suresh Chandra Goyal (Supra), Hon'ble High Court of Delhi observed: "59. Thus, when one party gives a security to the other, implicit in the said transaction is the … WebMar 18, 2024 · In Suresh Chandra Mittal's case (supra) the Court came out with an epoch-making ruling, viz., if an assessee files a revised …
CONCEALMENT PENALTY 271(1)(c), 158BFA & 271AAA
Webvi. CIT vs Suresh Chandra Mittal(2000) 241 ITR 124 (MP) 2.2. We have considered the rival submissions and perused the material available on record. The facts, in brief, are that a search and seizure operation u/s 132 of the Act was carried out at the business premises of M/s Etco Group as well as at the WebApr 24, 2015 · In case of CIT vs. Suresh Chandra Mittal 251 ITR 9 (SC), Hon’ble Supreme Court observed that if the assessee has offered the additional income to buy peace of … guttering leatherhead
Dr.B.Chendhilnathan, Chennai vs Department Of Income Tax on 29 ...
WebCommissioner Of Income-Tax vs Suresh Chandra Mittal on 26 July, 2001 Section 133(6) in The Income- Tax Act, 1995 Warning on Translation User Queries long terms capital gains stock exchange revised return bogus Revise income income or capital gains sale of share penalty proceedings suresh chandra mittal section 133(6) sureshchandra suresh … WebIndian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law Webcourt in the case of CIT vs. Suresh Chandra Mittal(2001) 251 ITR 9 (SC), affirming the decision by the Madhya Pradesh High Court ( reported at 241 ITR 124 (MP)) wherein the returns admitting additional income filed beyond the time limit available for furnishing revised returns were not considered invalid on that score. Further, a similar issue, had boxycharm september premium spoilers